The boxing world was recently abuzz following Artur Beterbiev’s hard-fought victory over Dmitry Bivol, which concluded with a majority decision on October 12. With a record of 21-0 and 20 knockouts, Beterbiev solidified his claim as the undisputed light heavyweight champion. However, rather than focusing on the excitement of his victory, Beterbiev has turned to his social media followers, questioning whether he should grant a rematch to Bivol. This begs the question: does Bivol truly deserve a second chance after such a lackluster performance?
The bout itself resembled a tactical duel, but not one that engaged fans in any meaningful way. Bivol’s strategy harkened back to the style of renowned defensive fighters like Shakur Stevenson, characterized by a reluctance to engage significantly and an emphasis on avoiding damage. Once Beterbiev ramped up the pressure in the sixth round, Bivol seemed content to retreat and tie up his opponent, leading to a fight that many spectators found tedious. The palpable frustration among the audience was evident, as they had eagerly anticipated a thrilling showdown only to be met with Bivol’s safety-first approach.
Typically, in the world of boxing, a fighter who suffers defeat must rebound through strategic positioning, often involving fights against rising contenders. In this case, Bivol should be encouraged to reclaim his status through bouts with other fighters, such as Joshua Buatsi, rather than expecting a direct rematch with Beterbiev. This is especially relevant given the current landscape of the light heavyweight division, where emerging talents are vying for their shot at glory.
One significant airtime concern for Beterbiev and boxing enthusiasts alike is the possibility of facing fighters who showcase aggression and a willingness to engage. Future matchups, particularly the anticipated clash on February 1 between David Benavidez and David Morrell, present enticing alternatives. Both Benavidez and Morrell are known for their dynamic fighting styles and would undoubtedly provide a more entertaining experience for fans than what Bivol delivered.
It’s imperative for champions like Beterbiev to focus on their legacy and continue to fight against engaging opponents. A rematch with Bivol may serve to satisfy the desires of a few, but it risks alienating a broader fanbase hungry for action and excitement. Instead of a revisit to an underwhelming match, Beterbiev should reinforce the standards of competition by denying Bivol an immediate title shot. Letting Bivol sit on the sidelines, forced to prove himself again, serves not only as a fair prerequisite but also a clear signal to his peers: delivering excitement is as crucial as delivering results in the ring. The fight game must evolve, and prioritizing genuine contenders will elevate the sport as a whole.
Leave a Reply