Canelo Alvarez has proudly claimed the title of the “Face of Boxing” for several years, basking in the glory of his achievements and financial success. Yet, his proclamation raises eyebrows in a sport increasingly populated by younger, fearless fighters who are eager to take risks and fight against fierce competition. Alvarez stands at 34, with a remarkable career spanning over a decade, but his recent choices and the opponents he has faced invite scrutiny. While he continues to draw in pay-per-view (PPV) revenue—substantially more than most fighters—there’s a growing sentiment that his reign may soon become a relic of the past.
Financially, Canelo is a juggernaut. He outstrips almost every other name in North American boxing for gross earnings, which arguably keeps him on the pedestal he claims. However, this financial success does not entirely align with the notion of being the “best” in the sport. His upcoming bout against William Scull on May 3rd illustrates this precarious state; the fight lacks the allure and thrill that once defined his PPV events against titans like Floyd Mayweather Jr. and Gennadiy Golovkin. Instead, this match will integrate into a larger event with Ryan Garcia, undermining Canelo’s individual star power.
Risk and Reputation: A Diminishing Path
The term “risk” is one that Alvarez appears to have sidestepped in recent years. By avoiding high-stakes matchups against notable competitors like David Benavidez and failing to face the likes of Dmitry Bivol again, Canelo’s claim of being the elite of boxing grows increasingly suspect. While he may express a sense of loyalty and respect for his long-time trainer Eddy Reynoso, those elements don’t fully justify what many see as a calculated detour from the rigorous demands of fight fans and boxing purists alike.
Acknowledging the competitive landscape, Canelo stated, “There are some really good fighters out there,” and rightly so. Yet the question arises: how does he assert his superiority if he consistently opts out of testing himself against the very best? Boxers like Benavidez and Terence Crawford loom large as ambitious, youthful forces bent on etching their names into boxing history, perhaps at Canelo’s expense. If “the best” considers themselves the epitome of excellence, one must wonder what the absence of challenge truly signifies.
The Illusion of Loyalty
Canelo’s remarks on loyalty may resonate on the surface, but they point to a troubling narrative regarding his present career stage. When one considers his current trajectory, it appears he may be constructing a carefully curated legacy rather than pursuing genuinely competitive engagements. While he showcases camaraderie with fellow fighters, his unwillingness to face Mexican boxers speaks volumes about the congestion at the top of this division.
By stating, “I don’t like to fight Mexicans because I always appreciate all the talent from Mexico,” Canelo inadvertently raises ethical concerns about the business of boxing. Is his motivation primarily rooted in national pride, or is it a strategic avoidance of competition that may tarnish his claimed superiority? For a man who claims to stand as a beacon for aspiring fighters, this is a questionable stance.
How Legacy is Forged in Disputes, Not Declines
Boxing thrives on the notion that true legends are made through formidable rivalries and fierce battles. Thus, if Canelo aims to solidify his status as the enduring “Face of Boxing,” he must actively engage with top-tier competition, including the likes of David Morrell, Christian Mbilli, and Artur Beterbiev. The sport fundamentally relies on the essence of risk-taking; the absence of such moves from someone in his position diminishes his potential for a legacy that goes beyond mere financial success.
Should Canelo emerge victorious against Terence Crawford or any validated competitor, it may regain some credibility. Yet, the specter of previous withdrawals casts a heavy shadow over any future triumphs. The world of boxing watches anxiously, waiting to see if Canelo can reassert his dominance in a divided landscape—a narrative riddled with uncertainty as he walks the line between making history and rested complacency.
Leave a Reply